Today we’re going to take on a different subject not related to programming… that’s right, we’re going to talk about politics. I will not discuss current events or current leaders; this post will not become dated. Rather, I’d like to take a step back and discuss why politics exists. Why do some people decide one thing, and other people are fervently decided against it? There is of course some self-interest, but it doesn’t take long to see that self-interest only influences a few issues, and generally isn’t responsible for all the passion. So what causes passionate politics? People become passionate when they think that they are in the right. So it all comes down to two questions: “How do we decide what is right? On what basis do we determine what is moral?”
I’ve been reading Psychologist Jonathan Haidt’s research and he did a study on personal morality that determines that people make moral judgement based on five factors. He self-identifies as a liberal, so to have a balanced view I read some conservative articles as well, which came up with a sixth factor. Here they are:
- Harm/Care. Will this help us taking care of our children, our elderly? Or will it put people in danger?
- Fairness/Reciprocity. Is it equal and just for all? Is everyone getting their fair due?
- Ingroup Loyalty. Is this going to betray our friends? Or will we be showing solidarity?
- Authority/Respect. Does this demonstrate respect and awe for those in power, or does it encourage dissent and anarchy?
- Purity/Sanctity. Is it nasty, or wholesome? Is it holy or an abomination?
- Liberty. Does this preserve someone’s rights, or does it infringe on them?
Haidt found that people who self-identify as liberal tend to care mostly about the first two issues – care and fairness. In contrast, conservatives feel more or less equally about the first five issues. Lastly, libertarians emphasize liberty higher than any other factor.
So what effect does this have on our discourse? When a liberal and a conservative discuss an issue, the liberal is going to come at it from two angles – Harm and Fairness. The conservative has five angles – harm, fairness, loyalty, respect for authority, and purity.
The result is they speak past each other. The liberal feels that the conservative is bringing up a lot of distractions that just don’t matter. He feels that the conservative is coming up with excuses to let needy people down and treat people unfairly. He determines that conservative must not truly care about people and must secretly hate large sections of society. Ultimately, the liberal finds himself believing that conservatives are evil.
The conservative is able to understand the liberal’s care and fairness arguments, but he doesn’t understand why the liberal ignores concerns about loyalty, respect, and purity. He feels that the liberal is refusing to evaluate all the considerations, that the liberal is taking a shallow approach to the argument. He determines that the liberal is taking intellectual shortcuts because he’s more interested in winning points than being honest. Ultimately, the conservative finds himself believing that liberals are willful idiots and liars.
Now that we know why the other guy is acting and talking the way he does, I hope that we can learn to put ourselves in each other’s shoes and think the way the other person thinks. It is my hope that by doing so, not only will we find ourselves better able to express ourselves in a way the others can relate to, but we can also be more patient and tolerant when they present their arguments to us.








